© 2002 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
|
The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on time to fracture healing: a meta-analysis
¶
**
From *the Oncidium Health Group Inc., Burlington, Ont.; the Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Orthopaedics and Psychiatry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; ¶the Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; and **the Chedoke Rehabilitation Centre, Chedoke–McMaster Hospital, Hamilton, Ont.
Correspondence to: Dr. Jason W. Busse, Oncidium Health Group Inc., 3-5205 Harvester Rd., Burlington ON L7L 6B5; fax 905 333-1214; j.busse{at}utoronto.ca
Background: The effect of low-intensity ultrasonography on fracture healing is controversial, and current management of fractures does not generally involve the use of ultrasound therapy. We describe a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy for healing of fractures.
Methods: We searched 5 electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Randomised Clinical Trials, HealthSTAR and CINAHL) for trials of ultrasonography and fracture healing, in any language, published from 1966 to December 2000. In addition, selected journals published from 1996 to December 2000 were searched by hand for relevant articles, and attempts were made to contact content experts in the area of ultrasound therapy and fracture healing as well as primary authors of reviewed trials. Trials selected for review met the following criteria: random allocation of treatments; inclusion of skeletally mature patients of either sex with 1 or more fractures; blinding of both the patient and the assessor(s) as to fracture healing; administration of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatments to at least 1 of the treatment groups; and assessment of time to fracture healing, as determined radiographically by bridging of 3 or 4 cortices. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria to blinded articles, and selected articles were scored for methodologic quality. The internal validity of each trial was assessed with the use of a 5-point scale that evaluates the quality of trial method on the basis of description and appropriateness of randomization and double-blinding, and assessment of study withdrawals and likelihood of bias.
Results: We identified 138 potentially eligible studies, of which 6 met our inclusion criteria. Agreement beyond chance of quality assessments of the 6 trials was good (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.77, p = 0.03). One trial was a repeat analysis of previously reported data, and 2 trials appeared to report on a shared group of subjects. Three trials, representing 158 fractures, were of sufficient homogeneity for pooling. The pooled results showed that time to fracture healing was significantly shorter in the groups receiving low-intensity ultrasound therapy than in the control groups. The weighted average effect size was 6.41 (95% confidence interval 1.01–11.81), which converts to a mean difference in healing time of 64 days between the treatment and control groups.
Interpretation: There is evidence from randomized trials that low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment may significantly reduce the time to fracture healing for fractures treated nonoperatively. There does not appear to be any additional benefit to ultrasound treatment following intramedullary nailing with prior reaming. Larger trials are needed to resolve this issue.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  I. P.S. Gill, R. J. Montgomery, and J. Wallis Successful treatment of sternal non-union by ultrasound Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, September 1, 2009; 9(3): 389 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. W Poolman Adjunctive non-invasive ways of healing bone fractures BMJ, February 27, 2009; 338(feb27_1): b11 - b11. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W Busse, J. Kaur, B. Mollon, M. Bhandari, P. Tornetta third, H. J Schunemann, and G. H Guyatt Low intensity pulsed ultrasonography for fractures: systematic review of randomised controlled trials BMJ, February 27, 2009; 338(feb27_1): b351 - b351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Hasegawa, M. Miwa, Y. Sakai, T. Niikura, M. Kurosaka, and T. Komori Osteogenic activity of human fracture haematoma-derived progenitor cells is stimulated by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in vitro J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2009; 91-B(2): 264 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. M. Novicoff, A. Manaswi, M. V. Hogan, S. M. Brubaker, W. M. Mihalko, and K. J. Saleh Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Current Technologies in Bone-Healing and Repair J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_1): 85 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Khan and C. T. Laurencin Fracture Repair with Ultrasound: Clinical and Cell-Based Evaluation J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_1): 138 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. J Robertson Invited commentary. Physical Therapy, August 1, 2007; 87(8): 995 - 999. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J Warden, R. K Fuchs, C. K Kessler, K. G Avin, R. E Cardinal, and R. L Stewart Ultrasound Produced by a Conventional Therapeutic Ultrasound Unit Accelerates Fracture Repair Physical Therapy, August 1, 2006; 86(8): 1118 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. J. Warden, K. G. Avin, E. M. Beck, M. E. DeWolf, M. A. Hagemeier, and K. M. Martin Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Accelerates and a Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Delays Knee Ligament Healing Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2006; 34(7): 1094 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. M. McAlinden Fracture healing using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 1, 2002; 167(2): 128 - 128. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|